Box Score

European Super Cup Men 2014 / Super Cup

Team Statistics

Overall Stats
Category Leaders
Per-game Stats
Analysis Stats

Overall Statistics

Team	avg	G	ab	r	h	2b	3b	hr	rbi	tb	slg%	bb	hbp	so	gdp	ob%	sf	sh	sb-att	po	a	e	fld%
DVH Amstelveen (NED)	.272	6	162	37	44	10	3	4	28	72	.444	18	1	58	2	.348	0	0	5-5	121	28	4	.974
Horsholm H.(DEN)	.241	7	170	25	41	7	2	2	20	58	.341	23	1	65	0	.333	1	2	8-11	135	36	6	.966
Spectrum (CZE)	.214	5	126	15	27	5	2	3	11	45	.357	9	4	56	0	.288	0	0	6-7	102	39	4	.972
Brasschaat (BEL)	.213	5	127	18	27	4	1	0	15	33	.260	11	2	64	2	.284	1	2	6-7	108	37	8	.948
Stenlose Bulls (DEN)	.208	8	202	30	42	8	2	2	21	60	.297	29	4	78	0	.318	1	2	7-9	155	31	6	.969
Radotinsky (CZE)	.178	4	90	3	16	1	2	0	3	21	.233	3	0	36	0	.204	0	0	1-1	66	21	6	.935
Pro Roma (ITA)	.170	4	100	8	17	1	2	1	8	25	.250	11	4	52	1	.278	0	1	2-3	80	8	2	.978
Havlickuv Brod (CZE)	.148	7	169	22	25	3	1	1	17	33	.195	15	2	87	0	.225	1	4	1-2	141	49	10	.950
Chicaboo's (BEL)	.047	4	85	1	4	1	0	0	0	5	.059	9	5	56	1	.182	0	1	5-8	84	33	3	.975
Totals	.197	50	1231	159	243	40	15	13	123	352	.286	128	23	552	6	.284	4	12	41-53	992	282	49	.963

(All games Sorted by Earned run avg)

Team era w-l g cg sho sv ip h r er bb so 2b 3b hr ab b/avg wp hbp bk sfa sha

DVH Amstelveen (NED) 0.45 5-1 6 5 4/0 0 40.1 16 4 2 8 89 2 0 0 139 .115 5 3 0 0 0

Horsholm H.(DEN) 1.20 5-2 7 3 1/0 0 45.0 27 15 6 10 84 5 3 1 166 .163 7 2 0 0 1

Pro Roma (ITA) 1.35 1-3 4 4 1/0 0 26.2 11 6 4 6 60 2 2 0 87 .126 2 1 0 1 1

Brasschaat (BEL) 2.75 3-2 5 3 2/1 0 36.0 33 21 11 10 58 6 2 1 143 .231 5 0 0 0 1

Spectrum (CZE) 2.91 3-2 5 4 1/0 0 34.0 20 12 11 18 42 4 3 1 119 .168 0 3 0 1 2

Stenlose Bulls (DEN) 3.48 4-4 8 6 2/0 0 51.2 42 27 20 19 87 7 3 2 195 .215 6 6 0 0 2

Havlickuv Brod (CZE) 3.64 3-4 7 3 1/0 1 47.0 40 26 19 20 71 4 1 3 183 .219 11 5 0 1 2

Chicaboo's (BEL) 4.50 1-3 4 0 1/1 0 28.0 26 17 14 16 35 7 0 2 109 .239 6 1 0 0 1

Radotinsky (CZE) 11.05 0-4 4 0 0/0 0 22.0 28 31 27 21 26 3 1 3 90 .311 8 2 2 1 2

Totals 3.10 25-25 50 28 13/2 1 330.2 243 159 114 128 552 40 15 13 1231 .197 50 23 2 4 12

PB - HOR 7, BRA 5, CHI 5, BUL 4, DVH 3, HAV 3, RAD 2, PRO 2, SPE 2. Pickoffs - BUL 1.

(All games Sorted by Fielding pct)

Team c po a e fld% dp sba csb sba% pb ci

Pro Roma (ITA) 90 80 8 2 .978 1 0 2 .000 2 0

Chicaboo's (BEL) 120 84 33 3 .975 3 5 1 .833 5 0

DVH Amstelveen (NED) 153 121 28 4 .974 0 3 4 .429 3 0

Spectrum (CZE) 145 102 39 4 .972 1 2 2 .500 2 0

Stenlose Bulls (DEN) 192 155 31 6 .969 1 11 1 .917 4 0

Horsholm H.(DEN) 177 135 36 6 .966 0 7 0 1.000 7 0

Havlickuv Brod (CZE) 200 141 49 10 .950 4 7 1 .875 3 0

Brasschaat (BEL) 153 108 37 8 .948 1 3 0 1.000 5 0

Radotinsky (CZE) 93 66 21 6 .935 3 3 1 .750 2 0

Totals 1323 992 282 49 .963 14 41 12 .774 33 0

Category Leaders

Batting avg
1.	DVH Amstelveen (NED)	.272
2.	Horsholm H.(DEN)	.241
3.	Spectrum (CZE)	.214
4.	Brasschaat (BEL)	.213
5.	Stenlose Bulls (DEN)	.208
6.	Radotinsky (CZE)	.178
7.	Pro Roma (ITA)	.170
8.	Havlickuv Brod (CZE)	.148
9.	Chicaboo's (BEL)	.047

Slugging pct
1.	DVH Amstelveen (NED)	.444
2.	Spectrum (CZE)	.357
3.	Horsholm H.(DEN)	.341
4.	Stenlose Bulls (DEN)	.297
5.	Brasschaat (BEL)	.260
6.	Pro Roma (ITA)	.250
7.	Radotinsky (CZE)	.233
8.	Havlickuv Brod (CZE)	.195
9.	Chicaboo's (BEL)	.059

On base pct
1.	DVH Amstelveen (NED)	.348
2.	Horsholm H.(DEN)	.333
3.	Stenlose Bulls (DEN)	.318
4.	Spectrum (CZE)	.288
5.	Brasschaat (BEL)	.284
6.	Pro Roma (ITA)	.278
7.	Havlickuv Brod (CZE)	.225
8.	Radotinsky (CZE)	.204
9.	Chicaboo's (BEL)	.182

Runs scored
1.	DVH Amstelveen (NED)	37
2.	Stenlose Bulls (DEN)	30
3.	Horsholm H.(DEN)	25
4.	Havlickuv Brod (CZE)	22
5.	Brasschaat (BEL)	18
6.	Spectrum (CZE)	15
7.	Pro Roma (ITA)	8
8.	Radotinsky (CZE)	3
9.	Chicaboo's (BEL)	1

Hits
1.	DVH Amstelveen (NED)	44
2.	Stenlose Bulls (DEN)	42
3.	Horsholm H.(DEN)	41
4.	Brasschaat (BEL)	27
	Spectrum (CZE)	27
6.	Havlickuv Brod (CZE)	25
7.	Pro Roma (ITA)	17
8.	Radotinsky (CZE)	16
9.	Chicaboo's (BEL)	4

Runs batted in
1.	DVH Amstelveen (NED)	28
2.	Stenlose Bulls (DEN)	21
3.	Horsholm H.(DEN)	20
4.	Havlickuv Brod (CZE)	17
5.	Brasschaat (BEL)	15
6.	Spectrum (CZE)	11
7.	Pro Roma (ITA)	8
8.	Radotinsky (CZE)	3

Doubles
1.	DVH Amstelveen (NED)	10
2.	Stenlose Bulls (DEN)	8
3.	Horsholm H.(DEN)	7
4.	Spectrum (CZE)	5
5.	Brasschaat (BEL)	4
6.	Havlickuv Brod (CZE)	3
7.	Pro Roma (ITA)	1
	Chicaboo's (BEL)	1
	Radotinsky (CZE)	1

Triples
1.	DVH Amstelveen (NED)	3
2.	Stenlose Bulls (DEN)	2
	Horsholm H.(DEN)	2
	Spectrum (CZE)	2
	Pro Roma (ITA)	2
	Radotinsky (CZE)	2
7.	Brasschaat (BEL)	1
	Havlickuv Brod (CZE)	1

Home runs
1.	DVH Amstelveen (NED)	4
2.	Spectrum (CZE)	3
3.	Horsholm H.(DEN)	2
	Stenlose Bulls (DEN)	2
5.	Havlickuv Brod (CZE)	1
	Pro Roma (ITA)	1

Total bases
1.	DVH Amstelveen (NED)	72
2.	Stenlose Bulls (DEN)	60
3.	Horsholm H.(DEN)	58
4.	Spectrum (CZE)	45
5.	Brasschaat (BEL)	33
	Havlickuv Brod (CZE)	33
7.	Pro Roma (ITA)	25
8.	Radotinsky (CZE)	21
9.	Chicaboo's (BEL)	5

Total plate appearances
1.	Stenlose Bulls (DEN)	238
2.	Horsholm H.(DEN)	197
3.	Havlickuv Brod (CZE)	191
4.	DVH Amstelveen (NED)	181
5.	Brasschaat (BEL)	143
6.	Spectrum (CZE)	139
7.	Pro Roma (ITA)	116
8.	Chicaboo's (BEL)	100
9.	Radotinsky (CZE)	93

At bats
1.	Stenlose Bulls (DEN)	202
2.	Horsholm H.(DEN)	170
3.	Havlickuv Brod (CZE)	169
4.	DVH Amstelveen (NED)	162
5.	Brasschaat (BEL)	127
6.	Spectrum (CZE)	126
7.	Pro Roma (ITA)	100
8.	Radotinsky (CZE)	90
9.	Chicaboo's (BEL)	85

Walks
1.	Stenlose Bulls (DEN)	29
2.	Horsholm H.(DEN)	23
3.	DVH Amstelveen (NED)	18
4.	Havlickuv Brod (CZE)	15
5.	Pro Roma (ITA)	11
	Brasschaat (BEL)	11
7.	Chicaboo's (BEL)	9
	Spectrum (CZE)	9
9.	Radotinsky (CZE)	3

Hit by pitch
1.	Chicaboo's (BEL)	5
2.	Spectrum (CZE)	4
	Pro Roma (ITA)	4
	Stenlose Bulls (DEN)	4
5.	Brasschaat (BEL)	2
	Havlickuv Brod (CZE)	2
7.	Horsholm H.(DEN)	1
	DVH Amstelveen (NED)	1

Strikeouts
1.	Havlickuv Brod (CZE)	87
2.	Stenlose Bulls (DEN)	78
3.	Horsholm H.(DEN)	65
4.	Brasschaat (BEL)	64
5.	DVH Amstelveen (NED)	58
6.	Spectrum (CZE)	56
	Chicaboo's (BEL)	56
8.	Pro Roma (ITA)	52
9.	Radotinsky (CZE)	36

Sac bunts
1.	Havlickuv Brod (CZE)	4
2.	Brasschaat (BEL)	2
	Stenlose Bulls (DEN)	2
	Horsholm H.(DEN)	2
5.	Chicaboo's (BEL)	1
	Pro Roma (ITA)	1

Sac flies
1.	Havlickuv Brod (CZE)	1
	Horsholm H.(DEN)	1
	Stenlose Bulls (DEN)	1
	Brasschaat (BEL)	1

Stolen bases
1.	Horsholm H.(DEN)	8
2.	Stenlose Bulls (DEN)	7
3.	Brasschaat (BEL)	6
	Spectrum (CZE)	6
5.	DVH Amstelveen (NED)	5
	Chicaboo's (BEL)	5
7.	Pro Roma (ITA)	2
8.	Radotinsky (CZE)	1
	Havlickuv Brod (CZE)	1

Caught stealing
1.	Chicaboo's (BEL)	3
	Horsholm H.(DEN)	3
3.	Stenlose Bulls (DEN)	2
4.	Pro Roma (ITA)	1
	Spectrum (CZE)	1
	Brasschaat (BEL)	1
	Havlickuv Brod (CZE)	1

Steal attempts
1.	Horsholm H.(DEN)	11
2.	Stenlose Bulls (DEN)	9
3.	Chicaboo's (BEL)	8
4.	Brasschaat (BEL)	7
	Spectrum (CZE)	7
6.	DVH Amstelveen (NED)	5
7.	Pro Roma (ITA)	3
8.	Havlickuv Brod (CZE)	2
9.	Radotinsky (CZE)	1

Grounded into DP
1.	Brasschaat (BEL)	2
	DVH Amstelveen (NED)	2
3.	Pro Roma (ITA)	1
	Chicaboo's (BEL)	1

Avg vs left
None

Avg vs right
1.	DVH Amstelveen (NED)	.272
2.	Horsholm H.(DEN)	.241
3.	Spectrum (CZE)	.214
4.	Brasschaat (BEL)	.213
5.	Stenlose Bulls (DEN)	.208
6.	Radotinsky (CZE)	.178
7.	Pro Roma (ITA)	.170
8.	Havlickuv Brod (CZE)	.148
9.	Chicaboo's (BEL)	.047

Pct reach as leadoff
1.	Spectrum (CZE)	.471
2.	Stenlose Bulls (DEN)	.415
3.	Horsholm H.(DEN)	.341
4.	DVH Amstelveen (NED)	.333
5.	Pro Roma (ITA)	.308
6.	Brasschaat (BEL)	.273
7.	Havlickuv Brod (CZE)	.271
8.	Chicaboo's (BEL)	.179
9.	Radotinsky (CZE)	.125

Avg w/2 outs
1.	DVH Amstelveen (NED)	.286
2.	Brasschaat (BEL)	.244
3.	Radotinsky (CZE)	.235
4.	Horsholm H.(DEN)	.226
5.	Spectrum (CZE)	.190
6.	Pro Roma (ITA)	.156
7.	Havlickuv Brod (CZE)	.145
8.	Stenlose Bulls (DEN)	.143
9.	Chicaboo's (BEL)	.036

Avg w/bases empty
1.	Horsholm H.(DEN)	.250
2.	Spectrum (CZE)	.242
3.	DVH Amstelveen (NED)	.235
4.	Stenlose Bulls (DEN)	.210
5.	Brasschaat (BEL)	.203
6.	Radotinsky (CZE)	.164
7.	Pro Roma (ITA)	.140
8.	Havlickuv Brod (CZE)	.096
9.	Chicaboo's (BEL)	.063

Avg w/runners
1.	DVH Amstelveen (NED)	.312
2.	Horsholm H.(DEN)	.232
3.	Havlickuv Brod (CZE)	.231
4.	Brasschaat (BEL)	.224
5.	Radotinsky (CZE)	.207
6.	Stenlose Bulls (DEN)	.206
7.	Pro Roma (ITA)	.200
8.	Spectrum (CZE)	.183
9.	Chicaboo's (BEL)	.000

Avg w/bases loaded
1.	Brasschaat (BEL)	.667
2.	Radotinsky (CZE)	.500
3.	DVH Amstelveen (NED)	.333
4.	Pro Roma (ITA)	.250
5.	Stenlose Bulls (DEN)	.000
	Horsholm H.(DEN)	.000
	Havlickuv Brod (CZE)	.000
	Chicaboo's (BEL)	.000

Avg w/RBI ops
1.	DVH Amstelveen (NED)	.370
2.	Horsholm H.(DEN)	.264
3.	Havlickuv Brod (CZE)	.250
4.	Brasschaat (BEL)	.211
5.	Stenlose Bulls (DEN)	.203
6.	Spectrum (CZE)	.185
7.	Pro Roma (ITA)	.167
8.	Radotinsky (CZE)	.125
9.	Chicaboo's (BEL)	.000

Pct adv runners
1.	DVH Amstelveen (NED)	.451
2.	Havlickuv Brod (CZE)	.438
3.	Stenlose Bulls (DEN)	.430
4.	Brasschaat (BEL)	.422
5.	Horsholm H.(DEN)	.419
6.	Radotinsky (CZE)	.345
7.	Pro Roma (ITA)	.327
8.	Spectrum (CZE)	.246
9.	Chicaboo's (BEL)	.120

Pinch hitting avg
1.	Brasschaat (BEL)	.500
2.	Horsholm H.(DEN)	.333
3.	Stenlose Bulls (DEN)	.143
4.	Havlickuv Brod (CZE)	.000
	Chicaboo's (BEL)	.000
	Pro Roma (ITA)	.000
	Radotinsky (CZE)	.000
	DVH Amstelveen (NED)	.000
	Spectrum (CZE)	.000

Pinch hit at bats
1.	Stenlose Bulls (DEN)	7
2.	Chicaboo's (BEL)	4
	Havlickuv Brod (CZE)	4
	Brasschaat (BEL)	4
5.	Horsholm H.(DEN)	3
	Pro Roma (ITA)	3
7.	Radotinsky (CZE)	2
8.	DVH Amstelveen (NED)	1
	Spectrum (CZE)	1

Pinch hits
1.	Brasschaat (BEL)	2
2.	Horsholm H.(DEN)	1
	Stenlose Bulls (DEN)	1

2-out RBIs
1.	DVH Amstelveen (NED)	14
2.	Horsholm H.(DEN)	9
3.	Stenlose Bulls (DEN)	7
	Spectrum (CZE)	7
5.	Brasschaat (BEL)	6
6.	Havlickuv Brod (CZE)	3
	Radotinsky (CZE)	3
8.	Pro Roma (ITA)	2

Runners advanced
1.	Havlickuv Brod (CZE)	15
2.	Horsholm H.(DEN)	12
	Stenlose Bulls (DEN)	12
4.	Brasschaat (BEL)	10
5.	Radotinsky (CZE)	3
	DVH Amstelveen (NED)	3
7.	Pro Roma (ITA)	2
	Spectrum (CZE)	2

Runners left on base
1.	Stenlose Bulls (DEN)	49
2.	Horsholm H.(DEN)	39
3.	DVH Amstelveen (NED)	29
4.	Pro Roma (ITA)	25
5.	Havlickuv Brod (CZE)	23
	Brasschaat (BEL)	23
7.	Spectrum (CZE)	22
8.	Radotinsky (CZE)	18
9.	Chicaboo's (BEL)	14

Fly outs
1.	Horsholm H.(DEN)	31
2.	Havlickuv Brod (CZE)	26
3.	Stenlose Bulls (DEN)	25
4.	DVH Amstelveen (NED)	24
5.	Spectrum (CZE)	18
6.	Radotinsky (CZE)	9
	Pro Roma (ITA)	9
8.	Brasschaat (BEL)	8
9.	Chicaboo's (BEL)	6

Ground outs
1.	Stenlose Bulls (DEN)	52
2.	Havlickuv Brod (CZE)	31
3.	Horsholm H.(DEN)	30
	DVH Amstelveen (NED)	30
5.	Radotinsky (CZE)	27
	Brasschaat (BEL)	27
7.	Spectrum (CZE)	24
8.	Pro Roma (ITA)	18
	Chicaboo's (BEL)	18

Fly outs/Ground outs
1.	Horsholm H.(DEN)	1.03
2.	Havlickuv Brod (CZE)	0.84
3.	DVH Amstelveen (NED)	0.80
4.	Spectrum (CZE)	0.75
5.	Pro Roma (ITA)	0.50
6.	Stenlose Bulls (DEN)	0.48
7.	Radotinsky (CZE)	0.33
	Chicaboo's (BEL)	0.33
9.	Brasschaat (BEL)	0.30

Ground outs/Fly outs
1.	Brasschaat (BEL)	3.38
2.	Radotinsky (CZE)	3.00
	Chicaboo's (BEL)	3.00
4.	Stenlose Bulls (DEN)	2.08
5.	Pro Roma (ITA)	2.00
6.	Spectrum (CZE)	1.33
7.	DVH Amstelveen (NED)	1.25
8.	Havlickuv Brod (CZE)	1.19
9.	Horsholm H.(DEN)	0.97

Hits per game
1.	DVH Amstelveen (NED)	7.33
2.	Horsholm H.(DEN)	5.86
3.	Brasschaat (BEL)	5.40
	Spectrum (CZE)	5.40
5.	Stenlose Bulls (DEN)	5.25
6.	Pro Roma (ITA)	4.25
7.	Radotinsky (CZE)	4.00
8.	Havlickuv Brod (CZE)	3.57
9.	Chicaboo's (BEL)	1.00

Runs scored per game
1.	DVH Amstelveen (NED)	6.17
2.	Stenlose Bulls (DEN)	3.75
3.	Brasschaat (BEL)	3.60
4.	Horsholm H.(DEN)	3.57
5.	Havlickuv Brod (CZE)	3.14
6.	Spectrum (CZE)	3.00
7.	Pro Roma (ITA)	2.00
8.	Radotinsky (CZE)	0.75
9.	Chicaboo's (BEL)	0.25

Doubles per game
1.	DVH Amstelveen (NED)	1.67
2.	Stenlose Bulls (DEN)	1.00
	Horsholm H.(DEN)	1.00
	Spectrum (CZE)	1.00
5.	Brasschaat (BEL)	0.80
6.	Havlickuv Brod (CZE)	0.43
7.	Pro Roma (ITA)	0.25
	Radotinsky (CZE)	0.25
	Chicaboo's (BEL)	0.25

Triples per game
1.	DVH Amstelveen (NED)	0.50
	Pro Roma (ITA)	0.50
	Radotinsky (CZE)	0.50
4.	Spectrum (CZE)	0.40
5.	Horsholm H.(DEN)	0.29
6.	Stenlose Bulls (DEN)	0.25
7.	Brasschaat (BEL)	0.20
8.	Havlickuv Brod (CZE)	0.14
9.	Chicaboo's (BEL)	0.00

Homers per game
1.	DVH Amstelveen (NED)	0.67
2.	Spectrum (CZE)	0.60
3.	Horsholm H.(DEN)	0.29
4.	Stenlose Bulls (DEN)	0.25
	Pro Roma (ITA)	0.25
6.	Havlickuv Brod (CZE)	0.14
7.	Brasschaat (BEL)	0.00
	Radotinsky (CZE)	0.00
	Chicaboo's (BEL)	0.00

RBIs per game
1.	DVH Amstelveen (NED)	4.67
2.	Brasschaat (BEL)	3.00
3.	Horsholm H.(DEN)	2.86
4.	Stenlose Bulls (DEN)	2.63
5.	Havlickuv Brod (CZE)	2.43
6.	Spectrum (CZE)	2.20
7.	Pro Roma (ITA)	2.00
8.	Radotinsky (CZE)	0.75
9.	Chicaboo's (BEL)	0.00

Stolen bases per game
1.	Chicaboo's (BEL)	1.25
2.	Brasschaat (BEL)	1.20
	Spectrum (CZE)	1.20
4.	Horsholm H.(DEN)	1.14
5.	Stenlose Bulls (DEN)	0.88
6.	DVH Amstelveen (NED)	0.83
7.	Pro Roma (ITA)	0.50
8.	Radotinsky (CZE)	0.25
9.	Havlickuv Brod (CZE)	0.14

Walks per game
1.	Stenlose Bulls (DEN)	3.63
2.	Horsholm H.(DEN)	3.29
3.	DVH Amstelveen (NED)	3.00
4.	Pro Roma (ITA)	2.75
5.	Chicaboo's (BEL)	2.25
6.	Brasschaat (BEL)	2.20
7.	Havlickuv Brod (CZE)	2.14
8.	Spectrum (CZE)	1.80
9.	Radotinsky (CZE)	0.75

Strikeouts per game
1.	Radotinsky (CZE)	9.00
2.	Horsholm H.(DEN)	9.29
3.	DVH Amstelveen (NED)	9.67
4.	Stenlose Bulls (DEN)	9.75
5.	Spectrum (CZE)	11.20
6.	Havlickuv Brod (CZE)	12.43
7.	Brasschaat (BEL)	12.80
8.	Pro Roma (ITA)	13.00
9.	Chicaboo's (BEL)	14.00

At bats per game
1.	DVH Amstelveen (NED)	27.00
2.	Brasschaat (BEL)	25.40
3.	Stenlose Bulls (DEN)	25.25
4.	Spectrum (CZE)	25.20
5.	Pro Roma (ITA)	25.00
6.	Horsholm H.(DEN)	24.29
7.	Havlickuv Brod (CZE)	24.14
8.	Radotinsky (CZE)	22.50
9.	Chicaboo's (BEL)	21.25

Plate appearances/game
1.	DVH Amstelveen (NED)	30.17
2.	Stenlose Bulls (DEN)	29.75
3.	Pro Roma (ITA)	29.00
4.	Brasschaat (BEL)	28.60
5.	Horsholm H.(DEN)	28.14
6.	Spectrum (CZE)	27.80
7.	Havlickuv Brod (CZE)	27.29
8.	Chicaboo's (BEL)	25.00
9.	Radotinsky (CZE)	23.25

Earned run avg
1.	DVH Amstelveen (NED)	0.45
2.	Horsholm H.(DEN)	1.20
3.	Pro Roma (ITA)	1.35
4.	Brasschaat (BEL)	2.75
5.	Spectrum (CZE)	2.91
6.	Stenlose Bulls (DEN)	3.48
7.	Havlickuv Brod (CZE)	3.64
8.	Chicaboo's (BEL)	4.50
9.	Radotinsky (CZE)	11.05

Opposing bat avg
1.	DVH Amstelveen (NED)	.115
2.	Pro Roma (ITA)	.126
3.	Horsholm H.(DEN)	.163
4.	Spectrum (CZE)	.168
5.	Stenlose Bulls (DEN)	.215
6.	Havlickuv Brod (CZE)	.219
7.	Brasschaat (BEL)	.231
8.	Chicaboo's (BEL)	.239
9.	Radotinsky (CZE)	.311

Innings pitched
1.	Stenlose Bulls (DEN)	51.2
2.	Havlickuv Brod (CZE)	47.0
3.	Horsholm H.(DEN)	45.0
4.	DVH Amstelveen (NED)	40.1
5.	Brasschaat (BEL)	36.0
6.	Spectrum (CZE)	34.0
7.	Chicaboo's (BEL)	28.0
8.	Pro Roma (ITA)	26.2
9.	Radotinsky (CZE)	22.0

Batters struck out
1.	DVH Amstelveen (NED)	89
2.	Stenlose Bulls (DEN)	87
3.	Horsholm H.(DEN)	84
4.	Havlickuv Brod (CZE)	71
5.	Pro Roma (ITA)	60
6.	Brasschaat (BEL)	58
7.	Spectrum (CZE)	42
8.	Chicaboo's (BEL)	35
9.	Radotinsky (CZE)	26

Batters SO out looking
1.	Horsholm H.(DEN)	24
2.	Stenlose Bulls (DEN)	19
3.	DVH Amstelveen (NED)	15
	Spectrum (CZE)	15
5.	Havlickuv Brod (CZE)	14
6.	Chicaboo's (BEL)	13
	Brasschaat (BEL)	13
	Pro Roma (ITA)	13
9.	Radotinsky (CZE)	4

Wins
1.	DVH Amstelveen (NED)	5
	Horsholm H.(DEN)	5
3.	Stenlose Bulls (DEN)	4
4.	Spectrum (CZE)	3
	Brasschaat (BEL)	3
	Havlickuv Brod (CZE)	3
7.	Pro Roma (ITA)	1
	Chicaboo's (BEL)	1

Losses
1.	Radotinsky (CZE)	4
	Stenlose Bulls (DEN)	4
	Havlickuv Brod (CZE)	4
4.	Pro Roma (ITA)	3
	Chicaboo's (BEL)	3
6.	Spectrum (CZE)	2
	Horsholm H.(DEN)	2
	Brasschaat (BEL)	2
9.	DVH Amstelveen (NED)	1

Saves
1.	Havlickuv Brod (CZE)	1

Runners picked off
1.	Stenlose Bulls (DEN)	1

Sac bunts allowed
1.	Stenlose Bulls (DEN)	2
	Radotinsky (CZE)	2
	Havlickuv Brod (CZE)	2
	Spectrum (CZE)	2
5.	Chicaboo's (BEL)	1
	Brasschaat (BEL)	1
	Horsholm H.(DEN)	1
	Pro Roma (ITA)	1

Sac flies allowed
1.	Radotinsky (CZE)	1
	Pro Roma (ITA)	1
	Spectrum (CZE)	1
	Havlickuv Brod (CZE)	1

Hits allowed
1.	Pro Roma (ITA)	11
2.	DVH Amstelveen (NED)	16
3.	Spectrum (CZE)	20
4.	Chicaboo's (BEL)	26
5.	Horsholm H.(DEN)	27
6.	Radotinsky (CZE)	28
7.	Brasschaat (BEL)	33
8.	Havlickuv Brod (CZE)	40
9.	Stenlose Bulls (DEN)	42

Runs allowed
1.	DVH Amstelveen (NED)	4
2.	Pro Roma (ITA)	6
3.	Spectrum (CZE)	12
4.	Horsholm H.(DEN)	15
5.	Chicaboo's (BEL)	17
6.	Brasschaat (BEL)	21
7.	Havlickuv Brod (CZE)	26
8.	Stenlose Bulls (DEN)	27
9.	Radotinsky (CZE)	31

Earned runs allowed
1.	DVH Amstelveen (NED)	2
2.	Pro Roma (ITA)	4
3.	Horsholm H.(DEN)	6
4.	Spectrum (CZE)	11
	Brasschaat (BEL)	11
6.	Chicaboo's (BEL)	14
7.	Havlickuv Brod (CZE)	19
8.	Stenlose Bulls (DEN)	20
9.	Radotinsky (CZE)	27

Walks allowed
1.	Pro Roma (ITA)	6
2.	DVH Amstelveen (NED)	8
3.	Horsholm H.(DEN)	10
	Brasschaat (BEL)	10
5.	Chicaboo's (BEL)	16
6.	Spectrum (CZE)	18
7.	Stenlose Bulls (DEN)	19
8.	Havlickuv Brod (CZE)	20
9.	Radotinsky (CZE)	21

Doubles allowed
1.	Pro Roma (ITA)	2
	DVH Amstelveen (NED)	2
3.	Radotinsky (CZE)	3
4.	Spectrum (CZE)	4
	Havlickuv Brod (CZE)	4
6.	Horsholm H.(DEN)	5
7.	Brasschaat (BEL)	6
8.	Chicaboo's (BEL)	7
	Stenlose Bulls (DEN)	7

Triples allowed
1.	DVH Amstelveen (NED)	0
	Chicaboo's (BEL)	0
3.	Havlickuv Brod (CZE)	1
	Radotinsky (CZE)	1
5.	Brasschaat (BEL)	2
	Pro Roma (ITA)	2
7.	Spectrum (CZE)	3
	Horsholm H.(DEN)	3
	Stenlose Bulls (DEN)	3

Home runs allowed
1.	DVH Amstelveen (NED)	0
	Pro Roma (ITA)	0
3.	Spectrum (CZE)	1
	Horsholm H.(DEN)	1
	Brasschaat (BEL)	1
6.	Stenlose Bulls (DEN)	2
	Chicaboo's (BEL)	2
8.	Havlickuv Brod (CZE)	3
	Radotinsky (CZE)	3

Wild pitches
1.	Havlickuv Brod (CZE)	11
2.	Radotinsky (CZE)	8
3.	Horsholm H.(DEN)	7
4.	Stenlose Bulls (DEN)	6
	Chicaboo's (BEL)	6
6.	Brasschaat (BEL)	5
	DVH Amstelveen (NED)	5
8.	Pro Roma (ITA)	2

Balks
1.	Radotinsky (CZE)	2

Hit batters
1.	Stenlose Bulls (DEN)	6
2.	Havlickuv Brod (CZE)	5
3.	Spectrum (CZE)	3
	DVH Amstelveen (NED)	3
5.	Horsholm H.(DEN)	2
	Radotinsky (CZE)	2
7.	Chicaboo's (BEL)	1
	Pro Roma (ITA)	1

Intentional BB allowed
1.	Havlickuv Brod (CZE)	3
	Chicaboo's (BEL)	3
3.	Stenlose Bulls (DEN)	2
	Brasschaat (BEL)	2
5.	DVH Amstelveen (NED)	1

B/avg vs left
1.	Stenlose Bulls (DEN)	.000
	Havlickuv Brod (CZE)	.000
	Horsholm H.(DEN)	.000
	Brasschaat (BEL)	.000
	DVH Amstelveen (NED)	.000
	Spectrum (CZE)	.000
	Chicaboo's (BEL)	.000
	Radotinsky (CZE)	.000
	Pro Roma (ITA)	.000

B/avg vs right
1.	DVH Amstelveen (NED)	.115
2.	Pro Roma (ITA)	.126
3.	Horsholm H.(DEN)	.163
4.	Spectrum (CZE)	.168
5.	Stenlose Bulls (DEN)	.215
6.	Havlickuv Brod (CZE)	.219
7.	Brasschaat (BEL)	.231
8.	Chicaboo's (BEL)	.239
9.	Radotinsky (CZE)	.311

B/avg vs leadoff
1.	DVH Amstelveen (NED)	.143
2.	Pro Roma (ITA)	.231
3.	Horsholm H.(DEN)	.244
4.	Brasschaat (BEL)	.273
5.	Spectrum (CZE)	.294
6.	Stenlose Bulls (DEN)	.365
7.	Chicaboo's (BEL)	.393
8.	Havlickuv Brod (CZE)	.426
9.	Radotinsky (CZE)	.545

B/avg w/2 outs
1.	Pro Roma (ITA)	.040
2.	DVH Amstelveen (NED)	.075
3.	Spectrum (CZE)	.146
4.	Horsholm H.(DEN)	.151
5.	Havlickuv Brod (CZE)	.183
6.	Stenlose Bulls (DEN)	.242
7.	Brasschaat (BEL)	.245
8.	Chicaboo's (BEL)	.256
9.	Radotinsky (CZE)	.323

B/avg w/runners
1.	DVH Amstelveen (NED)	.119
2.	Horsholm H.(DEN)	.161
3.	Havlickuv Brod (CZE)	.202
4.	Chicaboo's (BEL)	.204
5.	Spectrum (CZE)	.212
6.	Stenlose Bulls (DEN)	.217
7.	Pro Roma (ITA)	.231
8.	Brasschaat (BEL)	.265
9.	Radotinsky (CZE)	.333

Fly ball outs
1.	Stenlose Bulls (DEN)	27
2.	Spectrum (CZE)	21
	Havlickuv Brod (CZE)	21
4.	Horsholm H.(DEN)	20
5.	Brasschaat (BEL)	16
	Radotinsky (CZE)	16
7.	Chicaboo's (BEL)	13
8.	Pro Roma (ITA)	11
	DVH Amstelveen (NED)	11

Ground ball outs
1.	Havlickuv Brod (CZE)	46
2.	Stenlose Bulls (DEN)	36
3.	Spectrum (CZE)	35
4.	Chicaboo's (BEL)	34
5.	Horsholm H.(DEN)	32
	Brasschaat (BEL)	32
7.	DVH Amstelveen (NED)	19
8.	Radotinsky (CZE)	18
9.	Pro Roma (ITA)	5

Fly/Ground outs
1.	Pro Roma (ITA)	2.20
2.	Radotinsky (CZE)	0.89
3.	Stenlose Bulls (DEN)	0.75
4.	Horsholm H.(DEN)	0.63
5.	Spectrum (CZE)	0.60
6.	DVH Amstelveen (NED)	0.58
7.	Brasschaat (BEL)	0.50
8.	Havlickuv Brod (CZE)	0.46
9.	Chicaboo's (BEL)	0.38

Ground/Fly outs
1.	Chicaboo's (BEL)	2.62
2.	Havlickuv Brod (CZE)	2.19
3.	Brasschaat (BEL)	2.00
4.	DVH Amstelveen (NED)	1.73
5.	Spectrum (CZE)	1.67
6.	Horsholm H.(DEN)	1.60
7.	Stenlose Bulls (DEN)	1.33
8.	Radotinsky (CZE)	1.13
9.	Pro Roma (ITA)	0.45

Innings per game
1.	Brasschaat (BEL)	7.20
2.	Chicaboo's (BEL)	7.00
3.	Spectrum (CZE)	6.80
4.	DVH Amstelveen (NED)	6.72
5.	Havlickuv Brod (CZE)	6.71
6.	Pro Roma (ITA)	6.67
7.	Stenlose Bulls (DEN)	6.46
8.	Horsholm H.(DEN)	6.43
9.	Radotinsky (CZE)	5.50

Strikeouts/game
1.	Pro Roma (ITA)	20.25
2.	DVH Amstelveen (NED)	19.86
3.	Horsholm H.(DEN)	16.80
4.	Stenlose Bulls (DEN)	15.15
5.	Brasschaat (BEL)	14.50
6.	Havlickuv Brod (CZE)	13.60
7.	Chicaboo's (BEL)	11.25
8.	Spectrum (CZE)	11.12
9.	Radotinsky (CZE)	10.64

Walks allowed/game
1.	DVH Amstelveen (NED)	1.79
2.	Horsholm H.(DEN)	2.00
3.	Pro Roma (ITA)	2.03
4.	Brasschaat (BEL)	2.50
5.	Stenlose Bulls (DEN)	3.31
6.	Havlickuv Brod (CZE)	3.83
7.	Spectrum (CZE)	4.76
8.	Chicaboo's (BEL)	5.14
9.	Radotinsky (CZE)	8.59

Doubles allowed/game
1.	DVH Amstelveen (NED)	0.45
2.	Pro Roma (ITA)	0.68
3.	Havlickuv Brod (CZE)	0.77
4.	Horsholm H.(DEN)	1.00
5.	Spectrum (CZE)	1.06
6.	Stenlose Bulls (DEN)	1.22
7.	Radotinsky (CZE)	1.23
8.	Brasschaat (BEL)	1.50
9.	Chicaboo's (BEL)	2.25

Triples allowed/game
1.	DVH Amstelveen (NED)	0.00
	Chicaboo's (BEL)	0.00
3.	Havlickuv Brod (CZE)	0.19
4.	Radotinsky (CZE)	0.41
5.	Brasschaat (BEL)	0.50
6.	Stenlose Bulls (DEN)	0.52
7.	Horsholm H.(DEN)	0.60
8.	Pro Roma (ITA)	0.68
9.	Spectrum (CZE)	0.79

Homers allowed/game
1.	DVH Amstelveen (NED)	0.00
	Pro Roma (ITA)	0.00
3.	Horsholm H.(DEN)	0.20
4.	Brasschaat (BEL)	0.25
5.	Spectrum (CZE)	0.26
6.	Stenlose Bulls (DEN)	0.35
7.	Havlickuv Brod (CZE)	0.57
8.	Chicaboo's (BEL)	0.64
9.	Radotinsky (CZE)	1.23

Fly outs/game
1.	Radotinsky (CZE)	6.55
2.	Spectrum (CZE)	5.56
3.	Stenlose Bulls (DEN)	4.70
4.	Chicaboo's (BEL)	4.18
5.	Havlickuv Brod (CZE)	4.02
6.	Horsholm H.(DEN)	4.00
	Brasschaat (BEL)	4.00
8.	Pro Roma (ITA)	3.71
9.	DVH Amstelveen (NED)	2.45

Ground outs/game
1.	Chicaboo's (BEL)	10.93
2.	Spectrum (CZE)	9.26
3.	Havlickuv Brod (CZE)	8.81
4.	Brasschaat (BEL)	8.00
5.	Radotinsky (CZE)	7.36
6.	Horsholm H.(DEN)	6.40
7.	Stenlose Bulls (DEN)	6.27
8.	DVH Amstelveen (NED)	4.24
9.	Pro Roma (ITA)	1.69

Batters faced/game
1.	Radotinsky (CZE)	47.45
2.	Chicaboo's (BEL)	40.82
3.	Havlickuv Brod (CZE)	40.40
4.	Stenlose Bulls (DEN)	38.67
5.	Brasschaat (BEL)	38.50
6.	Spectrum (CZE)	37.85
7.	Horsholm H.(DEN)	35.80
8.	DVH Amstelveen (NED)	33.47
9.	Pro Roma (ITA)	32.40

Hits allowed/game
1.	DVH Amstelveen (NED)	3.57
2.	Pro Roma (ITA)	3.71
3.	Spectrum (CZE)	5.29
4.	Horsholm H.(DEN)	5.40
5.	Stenlose Bulls (DEN)	7.32
6.	Havlickuv Brod (CZE)	7.66
7.	Brasschaat (BEL)	8.25
8.	Chicaboo's (BEL)	8.36
9.	Radotinsky (CZE)	11.45

Runs allowed/game
1.	DVH Amstelveen (NED)	0.89
2.	Pro Roma (ITA)	2.03
3.	Horsholm H.(DEN)	3.00
4.	Spectrum (CZE)	3.18
5.	Stenlose Bulls (DEN)	4.70
6.	Havlickuv Brod (CZE)	4.98
7.	Brasschaat (BEL)	5.25
8.	Chicaboo's (BEL)	5.46
9.	Radotinsky (CZE)	12.68

Earned runs/game
1.	DVH Amstelveen (NED)	0.45
2.	Horsholm H.(DEN)	1.20
3.	Pro Roma (ITA)	1.35
4.	Brasschaat (BEL)	2.75
5.	Spectrum (CZE)	2.91
6.	Stenlose Bulls (DEN)	3.48
7.	Havlickuv Brod (CZE)	3.64
8.	Chicaboo's (BEL)	4.50
9.	Radotinsky (CZE)	11.05

Fielding pct
1.	Pro Roma (ITA)	.978
2.	Chicaboo's (BEL)	.975
3.	DVH Amstelveen (NED)	.974
4.	Spectrum (CZE)	.972
5.	Stenlose Bulls (DEN)	.969
6.	Horsholm H.(DEN)	.966
7.	Havlickuv Brod (CZE)	.950
8.	Brasschaat (BEL)	.948
9.	Radotinsky (CZE)	.935

Chances
1.	Havlickuv Brod (CZE)	200
2.	Stenlose Bulls (DEN)	192
3.	Horsholm H.(DEN)	177
4.	DVH Amstelveen (NED)	153
	Brasschaat (BEL)	153
6.	Spectrum (CZE)	145
7.	Chicaboo's (BEL)	120
8.	Radotinsky (CZE)	93
9.	Pro Roma (ITA)	90

Putouts
1.	Stenlose Bulls (DEN)	155
2.	Havlickuv Brod (CZE)	141
3.	Horsholm H.(DEN)	135
4.	DVH Amstelveen (NED)	121
5.	Brasschaat (BEL)	108
6.	Spectrum (CZE)	102
7.	Chicaboo's (BEL)	84
8.	Pro Roma (ITA)	80
9.	Radotinsky (CZE)	66

Assists
1.	Havlickuv Brod (CZE)	49
2.	Spectrum (CZE)	39
3.	Brasschaat (BEL)	37
4.	Horsholm H.(DEN)	36
5.	Chicaboo's (BEL)	33
6.	Stenlose Bulls (DEN)	31
7.	DVH Amstelveen (NED)	28
8.	Radotinsky (CZE)	21
9.	Pro Roma (ITA)	8

Errors
1.	Havlickuv Brod (CZE)	10
2.	Brasschaat (BEL)	8
3.	Horsholm H.(DEN)	6
	Stenlose Bulls (DEN)	6
	Radotinsky (CZE)	6
6.	Spectrum (CZE)	4
	DVH Amstelveen (NED)	4
8.	Chicaboo's (BEL)	3
9.	Pro Roma (ITA)	2

Fielding double plays
1.	Havlickuv Brod (CZE)	4
2.	Chicaboo's (BEL)	3
	Radotinsky (CZE)	3
4.	Stenlose Bulls (DEN)	1
	Brasschaat (BEL)	1
	Spectrum (CZE)	1
	Pro Roma (ITA)	1

Stolen bases against
1.	Stenlose Bulls (DEN)	11
2.	Havlickuv Brod (CZE)	7
	Horsholm H.(DEN)	7
4.	Chicaboo's (BEL)	5
5.	DVH Amstelveen (NED)	3
	Radotinsky (CZE)	3
	Brasschaat (BEL)	3
8.	Spectrum (CZE)	2

Caught stealing by
1.	DVH Amstelveen (NED)	4
2.	Spectrum (CZE)	2
	Pro Roma (ITA)	2
4.	Chicaboo's (BEL)	1
	Havlickuv Brod (CZE)	1
	Radotinsky (CZE)	1
	Stenlose Bulls (DEN)	1

Steal attempts against
1.	Stenlose Bulls (DEN)	12
2.	Havlickuv Brod (CZE)	8
3.	Horsholm H.(DEN)	7
	DVH Amstelveen (NED)	7
5.	Chicaboo's (BEL)	6
6.	Spectrum (CZE)	4
	Radotinsky (CZE)	4
8.	Brasschaat (BEL)	3
9.	Pro Roma (ITA)	2

Passed balls
1.	Horsholm H.(DEN)	7
2.	Chicaboo's (BEL)	5
	Brasschaat (BEL)	5
4.	Stenlose Bulls (DEN)	4
5.	DVH Amstelveen (NED)	3
	Havlickuv Brod (CZE)	3
7.	Pro Roma (ITA)	2
	Spectrum (CZE)	2
	Radotinsky (CZE)	2

Catchers interference
None

Per-Game Statistics

Team	g	ab	h/g	2b/g	3b/g	hr/g	bb/g	so/g	rbi/g	sb/g	r/g	*ab	*r	*h	*rbi	*bb	*k	*tb	*fly	*gnd
DVH Amstelveen (NED)	6	162	7.33	1.67	.50	.67	3.00	9.67	4.67	.83	6.17	89	20	24	15	9	32	39	13	16
Horsholm H.(DEN)	7	170	5.86	1.00	.29	.29	3.29	9.29	2.86	1.14	3.57	86	12	20	10	11	32	29	15	15
Spectrum (CZE)	5	126	5.40	1.00	.40	.60	1.80	11.20	2.20	1.20	3.00	90	10	19	7	6	40	32	12	17
Brasschaat (BEL)	5	127	5.40	.80	.20	.00	2.20	12.80	3.00	1.20	3.60	88	12	18	10	7	44	23	5	18
Stenlose Bulls (DEN)	8	202	5.25	1.00	.25	.25	3.63	9.75	2.63	.88	3.75	84	12	17	8	12	32	25	10	21
Radotinsky (CZE)	4	90	4.00	.25	.50	.00	.75	9.00	.75	.25	.75	96	3	17	3	3	38	22	9	29
Pro Roma (ITA)	4	100	4.25	.25	.50	.25	2.75	13.00	2.00	.50	2.00	86	6	14	6	9	44	21	7	15
Havlickuv Brod (CZE)	7	169	3.57	.43	.14	.14	2.14	12.43	2.43	.14	3.14	88	11	13	8	7	45	17	13	16
Chicaboo's (BEL)	4	85	1.00	.25	.00	.00	2.25	14.00	.00	1.25	.25	85	1	4	0	9	56	5	6	18
Totals	50	1231	4.86	.80	.30	.26	2.56	11.04	2.46	.82	3.18	88	11	17	8	9	39	25	11	18

* = average based on 100 plate appearances

(All games Sorted by Earned run avg)

Team g ip ip/g w l +ip +h +r +er +bb +so +2b +3b +hr +bf +era +fly +gnd

DVH Amstelveen (NED) 6 40.1 6.2 5 1 9.0 3.6 0.9 0.4 1.8 19.9 0.4 --- --- 33.5 0.45 2.5 4.2

Horsholm H.(DEN) 7 45.0 6.1 5 2 9.0 5.4 3.0 1.2 2.0 16.8 1.0 0.6 0.2 35.8 1.20 4.0 6.4

Pro Roma (ITA) 4 26.2 6.2 1 3 9.0 3.7 2.0 1.4 2.0 20.2 0.7 0.7 --- 32.4 1.35 3.7 1.7

Brasschaat (BEL) 5 36.0 7.0 3 2 9.0 8.2 5.2 2.8 2.5 14.5 1.5 0.5 0.2 38.5 2.75 4.0 8.0

Spectrum (CZE) 5 34.0 6.2 3 2 9.0 5.3 3.2 2.9 4.8 11.1 1.1 0.8 0.3 37.9 2.91 5.6 9.3

Stenlose Bulls (DEN) 8 51.2 6.1 4 4 9.0 7.3 4.7 3.5 3.3 15.2 1.2 0.5 0.3 38.7 3.48 4.7 6.3

Havlickuv Brod (CZE) 7 47.0 6.2 3 4 9.0 7.7 5.0 3.6 3.8 13.6 0.8 0.2 0.6 40.4 3.64 4.0 8.8

Chicaboo's (BEL) 4 28.0 7.0 1 3 9.0 8.4 5.5 4.5 5.1 11.2 2.2 --- 0.6 40.8 4.50 4.2 10.9

Radotinsky (CZE) 4 22.0 5.1 0 4 9.0 11.5 12.7 11.0 8.6 10.6 1.2 0.4 1.2 47.5 11.05 6.5 7.4

Totals 50 330.2 6.1 25 25 9.0 6.6 4.3 3.1 3.5 15.0 1.1 0.4 0.4 38.1 3.10 4.2 7.0

+ = average based on 9-inning game

Analysis Statistics

	vs Left			vs Right			w/runners on			w/bases empty			w/bases loaded			rch by leadoff			fly	gnd	fly/
Player	h	ab	avg	h	ab	avg	h	ab	avg	h	ab	avg	rch	ops	pct	h	ab	avg	out	out	gnd
Brasschaat (BEL)	0	0	---	27	127	.213	13	58	.224	14	69	.203	2	3	.667	9	33	.273	8	27	0.3
Stenlose Bulls (DEN)	0	0	---	42	202	.208	21	102	.206	21	100	.210	0	6	.000	22	53	.415	25	52	0.5
Chicaboo's (BEL)	0	0	---	4	85	.047	0	22	.000	4	63	.063	0	1	.000	5	28	.179	6	18	0.3
DVH Amstelveen (NED)	0	0	---	44	162	.272	24	77	.312	20	85	.235	1	3	.333	13	39	.333	24	30	0.8
Havlickuv Brod (CZE)	0	0	---	25	169	.148	15	65	.231	10	104	.096	0	2	.000	13	48	.271	26	31	0.8
Horsholm H.(DEN)	0	0	---	41	170	.241	19	82	.232	22	88	.250	0	4	.000	15	44	.341	31	30	1.0
Pro Roma (ITA)	0	0	---	17	100	.170	10	50	.200	7	50	.140	1	4	.250	8	26	.308	9	18	0.5
Radotinsky (CZE)	0	0	---	16	90	.178	6	29	.207	10	61	.164	1	2	.500	3	24	.125	9	27	0.3
Spectrum (CZE)	0	0	---	27	126	.214	11	60	.183	16	66	.242	0	0	---	16	34	.471	18	24	0.8
Totals	0	0	---	243	1231	.197	119	545	.218	124	686	.181	5	25	.200	104	329	.316	156	257	0.6

pinch hitting with runners
in scoring pos w/rnr on 3rd
and LT 2 out
with 2 outs 2-
out success
advancing rnrs #rnrs
adv
rnrs
rch
rch


Player h ab avg h ab avg rbi ops pct h ab avg rbi adv ops pct w/out lob err fc kl

Brasschaat (BEL) 2 4 .500 8 38 .211 6 10 .600 10 41 .244 6 27 64 .422 10 23 3 4 13

Stenlose Bulls (DEN) 1 7 .143 14 69 .203 7 15 .467 9 63 .143 7 49 114 .430 12 49 8 9 25

Chicaboo's (BEL) 0 4 .000 0 11 .000 0 1 .000 1 28 .036 0 3 25 .120 0 14 2 1 12

DVH Amstelveen (NED) 0 1 .000 20 54 .370 6 10 .600 16 56 .286 14 37 82 .451 3 29 5 3 13

Havlickuv Brod (CZE) 0 4 .000 9 36 .250 7 8 .875 8 55 .145 3 32 73 .438 15 23 4 3 22

Horsholm H.(DEN) 1 3 .333 14 53 .264 5 17 .294 12 53 .226 9 39 93 .419 12 39 3 5 11

Pro Roma (ITA) 0 3 .000 5 30 .167 5 9 .556 5 32 .156 2 18 55 .327 2 25 3 5 13

Radotinsky (CZE) 0 2 .000 2 16 .125 0 2 .000 8 34 .235 3 10 29 .345 3 18 2 3 9

Spectrum (CZE) 0 1 .000 5 27 .185 1 3 .333 8 42 .190 7 15 61 .246 2 22 2 5 12

Totals 4 29 .138 77 334 .231 37 75 .493 77 404 .191 51 230 596 .386 59 253 32 38 130

Success Advancing Runners = percentage of times the batter advanced at least one runner during a plate appearance
#Rnrs Adv w/Out = TOTAL number of runners advanced when the player made an out

   vs Left vs Right w/runners on w/bases empty rch by leadoff with 2 outs fly gnd fly/

Player h ab avg h ab avg h ab avg h ab avg rch ops pct h ab avg out out gnd

Brasschaat (BEL) 0 0 --- 33 143 .231 18 68 .265 15 75 .200 9 33 .273 12 49 .245 16 32 0.5

Stenlose Bulls (DEN) 0 0 --- 42 195 .215 20 92 .217 22 103 .214 19 52 .365 16 66 .242 27 36 0.8

Chicaboo's (BEL) 0 0 --- 26 109 .239 11 54 .204 15 55 .273 11 28 .393 10 39 .256 13 34 0.4

DVH Amstelveen (NED) 0 0 --- 16 139 .115 5 42 .119 11 97 .113 6 42 .143 3 40 .075 11 19 0.6

Havlickuv Brod (CZE) 0 0 --- 40 183 .219 18 89 .202 22 94 .234 20 47 .426 11 60 .183 21 46 0.5

Horsholm H.(DEN) 0 0 --- 27 166 .163 10 62 .161 17 104 .163 11 45 .244 8 53 .151 20 32 0.6

Pro Roma (ITA) 0 0 --- 11 87 .126 6 26 .231 5 61 .082 6 26 .231 1 25 .040 11 5 2.2

Radotinsky (CZE) 0 0 --- 28 90 .311 20 60 .333 8 30 .267 12 22 .545 10 31 .323 16 18 0.9

Spectrum (CZE) 0 0 --- 20 119 .168 11 52 .212 9 67 .134 10 34 .294 6 41 .146 21 35 0.6

Totals 0 0 --- 243 1231 .197 119 545 .218 124 686 .181 104 329 .316 77 404 .191 156 257 0.6

Player
app-gs ip/
app
h/g
r/g
er/g
bb/g
so/g k/bb
ratio
2b/g
3b/g
hr/g
fo/g
go/g
bf/g
sba-att sba
pct

Brasschaat (BEL) 5-5 7.20 8.25 5.25 2.75 2.50 14.50 5.8 1.50 0.50 0.25 4.00 8.00 38.50 3-3 1.000

Stenlose Bulls (DEN) 8-8 6.46 7.32 4.70 3.48 3.31 15.15 4.6 1.22 0.52 0.35 4.70 6.27 38.67 11-12 .917

Chicaboo's (BEL) 4-4 7.00 8.36 5.46 4.50 5.14 11.25 2.2 2.25 0.00 0.64 4.18 10.93 40.82 5-6 .833

DVH Amstelveen (NED) 6-6 6.72 3.57 0.89 0.45 1.79 19.86 11.1 0.45 0.00 0.00 2.45 4.24 33.47 3-7 .429

Havlickuv Brod (CZE) 7-7 6.71 7.66 4.98 3.64 3.83 13.60 3.6 0.77 0.19 0.57 4.02 8.81 40.40 7-8 .875

Horsholm H.(DEN) 7-7 6.43 5.40 3.00 1.20 2.00 16.80 8.4 1.00 0.60 0.20 4.00 6.40 35.80 7-7 1.000

Pro Roma (ITA) 4-4 6.67 3.71 2.03 1.35 2.03 20.25 10.0 0.68 0.68 0.00 3.71 1.69 32.40 0-2 .000

Radotinsky (CZE) 4-4 5.50 11.45 12.68 11.05 8.59 10.64 1.2 1.23 0.41 1.23 6.55 7.36 47.45 3-4 .750

Spectrum (CZE) 5-5 6.80 5.29 3.18 2.91 4.76 11.12 2.3 1.06 0.79 0.26 5.56 9.26 37.85 2-4 .500

Totals 50-50 6.61 6.61 4.33 3.10 3.48 15.02 4.3 1.09 0.41 0.35 4.25 6.99 38.05 41-53 .774

* = average based on 9-inning game

ESF

Abbreviations

Team	era	w-l	g	cg	sho	sv	ip	h	r	er	bb	so	2b	3b	hr	ab	b/avg	wp	hbp	bk	sfa	sha
DVH Amstelveen (NED)	0.45	5-1	6	5	4/0	0	40.1	16	4	2	8	89	2	0	0	139	.115	5	3	0	0	0
Horsholm H.(DEN)	1.20	5-2	7	3	1/0	0	45.0	27	15	6	10	84	5	3	1	166	.163	7	2	0	0	1
Pro Roma (ITA)	1.35	1-3	4	4	1/0	0	26.2	11	6	4	6	60	2	2	0	87	.126	2	1	0	1	1
Brasschaat (BEL)	2.75	3-2	5	3	2/1	0	36.0	33	21	11	10	58	6	2	1	143	.231	5	0	0	0	1
Spectrum (CZE)	2.91	3-2	5	4	1/0	0	34.0	20	12	11	18	42	4	3	1	119	.168	0	3	0	1	2
Stenlose Bulls (DEN)	3.48	4-4	8	6	2/0	0	51.2	42	27	20	19	87	7	3	2	195	.215	6	6	0	0	2
Havlickuv Brod (CZE)	3.64	3-4	7	3	1/0	1	47.0	40	26	19	20	71	4	1	3	183	.219	11	5	0	1	2
Chicaboo's (BEL)	4.50	1-3	4	0	1/1	0	28.0	26	17	14	16	35	7	0	2	109	.239	6	1	0	0	1
Radotinsky (CZE)	11.05	0-4	4	0	0/0	0	22.0	28	31	27	21	26	3	1	3	90	.311	8	2	2	1	2
Totals	3.10	25-25	50	28	13/2	1	330.2	243	159	114	128	552	40	15	13	1231	.197	50	23	2	4	12

Team	c	po	a	e	fld%	dp	sba	csb	sba%	pb	ci
Pro Roma (ITA)	90	80	8	2	.978	1	0	2	.000	2	0
Chicaboo's (BEL)	120	84	33	3	.975	3	5	1	.833	5	0
DVH Amstelveen (NED)	153	121	28	4	.974	0	3	4	.429	3	0
Spectrum (CZE)	145	102	39	4	.972	1	2	2	.500	2	0
Stenlose Bulls (DEN)	192	155	31	6	.969	1	11	1	.917	4	0
Horsholm H.(DEN)	177	135	36	6	.966	0	7	0	1.000	7	0
Havlickuv Brod (CZE)	200	141	49	10	.950	4	7	1	.875	3	0
Brasschaat (BEL)	153	108	37	8	.948	1	3	0	1.000	5	0
Radotinsky (CZE)	93	66	21	6	.935	3	3	1	.750	2	0
Totals	1323	992	282	49	.963	14	41	12	.774	33	0

Team	g	ip	ip/g	w	l	+ip	+h	+r	+er	+bb	+so	+2b	+3b	+hr	+bf	+era	+fly	+gnd
DVH Amstelveen (NED)	6	40.1	6.2	5	1	9.0	3.6	0.9	0.4	1.8	19.9	0.4	---	---	33.5	0.45	2.5	4.2
Horsholm H.(DEN)	7	45.0	6.1	5	2	9.0	5.4	3.0	1.2	2.0	16.8	1.0	0.6	0.2	35.8	1.20	4.0	6.4
Pro Roma (ITA)	4	26.2	6.2	1	3	9.0	3.7	2.0	1.4	2.0	20.2	0.7	0.7	---	32.4	1.35	3.7	1.7
Brasschaat (BEL)	5	36.0	7.0	3	2	9.0	8.2	5.2	2.8	2.5	14.5	1.5	0.5	0.2	38.5	2.75	4.0	8.0
Spectrum (CZE)	5	34.0	6.2	3	2	9.0	5.3	3.2	2.9	4.8	11.1	1.1	0.8	0.3	37.9	2.91	5.6	9.3
Stenlose Bulls (DEN)	8	51.2	6.1	4	4	9.0	7.3	4.7	3.5	3.3	15.2	1.2	0.5	0.3	38.7	3.48	4.7	6.3
Havlickuv Brod (CZE)	7	47.0	6.2	3	4	9.0	7.7	5.0	3.6	3.8	13.6	0.8	0.2	0.6	40.4	3.64	4.0	8.8
Chicaboo's (BEL)	4	28.0	7.0	1	3	9.0	8.4	5.5	4.5	5.1	11.2	2.2	---	0.6	40.8	4.50	4.2	10.9
Radotinsky (CZE)	4	22.0	5.1	0	4	9.0	11.5	12.7	11.0	8.6	10.6	1.2	0.4	1.2	47.5	11.05	6.5	7.4
Totals	50	330.2	6.1	25	25	9.0	6.6	4.3	3.1	3.5	15.0	1.1	0.4	0.4	38.1	3.10	4.2	7.0

	pinch hitting			with runners in scoring pos			w/rnr on 3rd and LT 2 out			with 2 outs			2- out	success advancing rnrs			#rnrs adv	rnrs	rch	rch
Player	h	ab	avg	h	ab	avg	rbi	ops	pct	h	ab	avg	rbi	adv	ops	pct	w/out	lob	err	fc	kl
Brasschaat (BEL)	2	4	.500	8	38	.211	6	10	.600	10	41	.244	6	27	64	.422	10	23	3	4	13
Stenlose Bulls (DEN)	1	7	.143	14	69	.203	7	15	.467	9	63	.143	7	49	114	.430	12	49	8	9	25
Chicaboo's (BEL)	0	4	.000	0	11	.000	0	1	.000	1	28	.036	0	3	25	.120	0	14	2	1	12
DVH Amstelveen (NED)	0	1	.000	20	54	.370	6	10	.600	16	56	.286	14	37	82	.451	3	29	5	3	13
Havlickuv Brod (CZE)	0	4	.000	9	36	.250	7	8	.875	8	55	.145	3	32	73	.438	15	23	4	3	22
Horsholm H.(DEN)	1	3	.333	14	53	.264	5	17	.294	12	53	.226	9	39	93	.419	12	39	3	5	11
Pro Roma (ITA)	0	3	.000	5	30	.167	5	9	.556	5	32	.156	2	18	55	.327	2	25	3	5	13
Radotinsky (CZE)	0	2	.000	2	16	.125	0	2	.000	8	34	.235	3	10	29	.345	3	18	2	3	9
Spectrum (CZE)	0	1	.000	5	27	.185	1	3	.333	8	42	.190	7	15	61	.246	2	22	2	5	12
Totals	4	29	.138	77	334	.231	37	75	.493	77	404	.191	51	230	596	.386	59	253	32	38	130

Player	app-gs	ip/ app	h/g	r/g	er/g	bb/g	so/g	k/bb ratio	2b/g	3b/g	hr/g	fo/g	go/g	bf/g	sba-att	sba pct
Brasschaat (BEL)	5-5	7.20	8.25	5.25	2.75	2.50	14.50	5.8	1.50	0.50	0.25	4.00	8.00	38.50	3-3	1.000
Stenlose Bulls (DEN)	8-8	6.46	7.32	4.70	3.48	3.31	15.15	4.6	1.22	0.52	0.35	4.70	6.27	38.67	11-12	.917
Chicaboo's (BEL)	4-4	7.00	8.36	5.46	4.50	5.14	11.25	2.2	2.25	0.00	0.64	4.18	10.93	40.82	5-6	.833
DVH Amstelveen (NED)	6-6	6.72	3.57	0.89	0.45	1.79	19.86	11.1	0.45	0.00	0.00	2.45	4.24	33.47	3-7	.429
Havlickuv Brod (CZE)	7-7	6.71	7.66	4.98	3.64	3.83	13.60	3.6	0.77	0.19	0.57	4.02	8.81	40.40	7-8	.875
Horsholm H.(DEN)	7-7	6.43	5.40	3.00	1.20	2.00	16.80	8.4	1.00	0.60	0.20	4.00	6.40	35.80	7-7	1.000
Pro Roma (ITA)	4-4	6.67	3.71	2.03	1.35	2.03	20.25	10.0	0.68	0.68	0.00	3.71	1.69	32.40	0-2	.000
Radotinsky (CZE)	4-4	5.50	11.45	12.68	11.05	8.59	10.64	1.2	1.23	0.41	1.23	6.55	7.36	47.45	3-4	.750
Spectrum (CZE)	5-5	6.80	5.29	3.18	2.91	4.76	11.12	2.3	1.06	0.79	0.26	5.56	9.26	37.85	2-4	.500
Totals	50-50	6.61	6.61	4.33	3.10	3.48	15.02	4.3	1.09	0.41	0.35	4.25	6.99	38.05	41-53	.774